You have six tasks to address in order to complete the assignment. (Book file: SocialIssuesPaperAssignment.pdf)
1. Select a suitable reaction statement.
2. Explain your selection
3. Clearly define the issue addressed in the statement.
Follow the example file "Topic-1-example-B2.docx" to edit my file "Editthisfile.docx".
Social Issues Paper
1. Reaction Statement
“Doctors should maintain the right to deceive and withhold information from their patients as they see fit.”
2. Explanation of Selection
As a Christian, I am engaged in a constant search for truth, particularly that concerning the question of what is ethical. There are very few areas of life where ethical questions have black and white answers. However, no area is as comprehensively gray, nor does one involve so many important and pressing issues as the area of bioethics. In many cases, lives depend on what is deemed ethical by the doctors, the patients, and the patients’ families. The doctor-patient relationship may be the most precarious social relationship and certainly the one with the highest stakes.
3. Definition of Issue
In order to truly understand the issue of lying in the doctor-patient relationship, we must consider the reasons that a doctor might choose to deceive his or her patient. There are three primary reasons a doctor might consider lying to a patient (Gillon, 1982). The first springs from the obligation of doctors not to harm their patients. If informing the patient causes undue suffering and worry, it may be better to leave some information undisclosed. Secondly, the doctor may withhold information from a patient due to lack of comprehension – either on the part of the doctor regarding the diagnosis, or on the part of the patient regarding the ins and outs of medical procedures. Lastly, a doctor may withhold information if the patient does not wish to know. Each of these reasons has its own nuances, and so the question is to determine in which scenario, if any, there is such thing as an acceptable lie. In my paper, I will consider not only the ethical aspects of this question, but also the more pragmatic and economic facets of the discussion.
Gillon, R. (1982). On telling dying patients the truth. Journal of Medical Ethics, 8(3), 115-116. Retrieved from jme.bmj.com.
Running Head: CAPITAL PUNISHMENT 1
CAPITAL PUNISHMENT 2
Capital punishment is not necessary
Capital punishment is not necessary.
Capital punishment is among the persuasive arguments that are in every mouth of Americans. A large number of Americans are not supporting it, while some feel it is necessary. Capital punishment is also referred to as the death penalty. The state kills a person found guilty of a crime. In some states, there is a sentence known as the death sentence, which requires the offender to be punished. The act of killing the offender is known as an execution.
Is capital punishment a religious act? No. As a Christian, I believe no person has the mandate to cut off another person’s life other than God. God commanded that “though shall not kill” in Mathew when he gave the ten commandments; this explicitly teaches capital punishment without exceptions. Again, the religion of Christianity is anchored on two virtues; compassion and forgiveness (Lernestedt, 2015). It means capital punishment is not compatible with these two virtues. There are some Christians who argue that capital punishment is only meant for the poor. Contrary, Christianity is about supporting the indigent, and thus they do not support capital punishment.
If the law calling for capital punishment is passed, several innocent people will die due to flaws within the judicial system. There are cases of people wrongly convicted that emerge daily, with their ordeals being horrible. I also believe the life of everybody is so valuable that even those with the worst cases like murder should not be deprived of their right to life. Their ill-conduct should not destroy the value of their lives. There is also an explicit provision to all persons' right to life, including those who have killed others. Therefore, executing them is against this provision.
In conclusion, there is no justification for upholding capital punishment; this is because killing a man to justify his last act is intrinsically evil.
Lernestedt, C. (2015). The Ethics of Capital Punishment. A Philosophical Investigation of Evil and Its Consequences, by Matthew H. Kramer.
We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework.
Yes. We have posted over our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications and future communication.
2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the "PAPER INFORMATION" section and click “PRICE CALCULATION” at the bottom to calculate your order price.
3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.
Why Hire Safehomework.com writers to do your paper?